Pairings
All cards

Shamann Walton × SEIU Local 1021

Published 2026-11-06 · Official's words: Board of Supervisors, 2026-07-14, transcript time 02:39:58 to 02:40:56 · City transcript · Meeting recording

Wording is the city's caption transcript, re-read word for word; it has not been checked against the recording.

Money in, then the donor's priority

$500 Schedule A to Shamann Walton for School Board 2014 (filer 147120072)
own committee, for another office (School Board); 1 row, 2015-04-22
GivenFiling (version)FiledAmountGiver as filed
2015-04-22155520026 (v1)2015-07-30$500Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 1021
Schedule A total for this committee: $500 in 1 row.
$500 Schedule A to Committee to Elect Shamann Walton for SF Board of Education 2012 (filer 130665917)
own committee, for another office (School Board); 1 row, 2012-10-30
GivenFiling (version)FiledAmountGiver as filed
2012-10-30139507483 (v1)2013-02-01$500SEIU Local 1021
Schedule A total for this committee: $500 in 1 row.
One line per receiving committee; totals are never summed across committees. Retrieved 2026-10-30 from the Ethics Commission's Transactions dataset (data loaded through 2026-10-30).
SEIU Local 1021: stated priority
Tie to the donor recognised by name only (2 giver names as filed); FPPC id that resolves in the Filers dataset: 1296948 ('Service Employees International Union 1021 Candidate PAC').
endorsement list on the organisation's own site.
San Francisco, local ballot measures
"Proposition D - Changes to Ballot Measure Process - Vote NO"
page dated 2026-09-28; source page; retrieved 2026-10-30
endorsement list on the organisation's own site.
San Francisco, local ballot measures
"Proposition E - City Administrator's Authority and Changes to City Contracting - Vote NO"
page dated 2026-09-28; source page; retrieved 2026-10-30
endorsement list on the organisation's own site.
San Francisco, local ballot measures
"Proposition F - Changes to Executive Branch Management - Vote NO"
page dated 2026-09-28; source page; retrieved 2026-10-30
endorsement list on the organisation's own site.
Election Endorsements: Nov 3, 2026
"Each election, SEIU 1021 members endorse candidates who will stand with us as we fight to win strong contracts and protect working standards."
page dated 2026-09-28; source page; retrieved 2026-10-30

The official

Shamann Walton
Supervisor, District 10

San Francisco official, as the city's roster has them.

The official's exact words

"COLLEAGUES I AM ALSO REQUESTING THE BUDGET AND LEGISLATIVE ANALYSTS TO INTERPRET CLEARLY ANALYZE THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE CHARTER REFORM MEASURES PROPOSED BY MAYOR LURIE THAT ARE CURRENTLY UNDERGOING THE SIGNATURE VERIFICATION PROCESS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS. SAN FRANCISCO VOTERS ARE BEING ASKED TO DECIDE ON THREE CHARTER REFORM MEASURES THIS NOVEMBER THAT WERE FUNDAMENTAL RESTRUCTURE HOW THE CITY OPERATES INCLUDING A SPENDING MAYORAL HIRING AND FIRING AUTHORITY AS WELL AS REORGANIZATION POWER. EXTENDING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S TERM TO TEN YEARS WHILE GIVING THAT OFFICE SO AUTHORITY OVER PROCUREMENT. AND RAISING THE SIGNATURE THRESHOLD FOR CITIZEN INITIATIVES FROM 2% TO 8%. >> THESE ARE NOT SMALL TECHNICAL FIXES. THEY SHIFT REAL POWER AWAY FROM THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONS AND FROM THE RESIDENTS OF SAN FRANCISCO."
Board of Supervisors, 2026-07-14, transcript time 02:39:58 to 02:40:56
SPEAKER-CREDIT DOUBT: LOW Reading, not a finding. In common: Same measures: the quote names 'THE CHARTER REFORM MEASURES PROPOSED BY MAYOR LURIE' (a spending ... mayoral hiring and firing authority, the City Administrator's term and procurement, and the signature threshold for initiatives); the union's page lists Props D, E and F with a recommendation on each. Where they differ: The quote asks for a cost analysis and says the measures 'SHIFT REAL POWER AWAY FROM THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS'; the union's page says Vote NO on each. Both are critical of the measures on their face. (My reading.) No cause is claimed.
Who is speaking: Shamann Walton, Supervisor, District 10. Walton is called at 02:36:50 ('SUPERVISOR WALTON THANK YOU, MADAM CLERK'), says 'I AM INTRODUCING A RESOLUTION AND ALSO A BILL A REQUEST', and the request here is the 'also'. The remarks say 'DISTRICT TEN RESIDENTS' and 'DISTRICT TEN WILL SOON FACE' (District 10 is Walton on the roster) and thank 'SUPERVISOR CHEN AS WELL AS SUPERVISOR FIELDER', so the speaker is neither of those. The chair moves on at 02:42:48 ('THE REST I SUBMIT ... SUPERVISOR WALTON'). Doubt in the credit: No name cue directly before the passage (the cue is three minutes earlier, with '>>' marks between); the speaker's own 'District Ten' and the chair's closing agree with Walton.
Caption rows that name the speaker
  • 02:36:50 YOU. SUPERVISOR WALTON THANK YOU,
  • 02:36:56 INTRODUCING A RESOLUTION AND ALSO A BILL A REQUEST.
  • 02:37:05 CONTINUING THE BABY'S SHADOW. >> DISTRICT TEN RESIDENTS
  • 02:38:45 EMPOWERMENT. AS MANY OF YOU KNOW, DISTRICT
  • 02:38:49 TEN WILL SOON FACE ADDITIONAL TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES AS
  • 02:39:46 RESOLUTION. I ALSO WANT TO THANK MY
  • 02:39:54 WELL AS SUPERVISOR FIELDER FOR THE EARLY CO-SPONSORSHIP.
  • 02:42:48 THE REST I SUBMIT. >> THANK YOU.
Highlighted: words literally in both the quote and the donor's words ("City Administrator's").
Sources: transcript (Board of Supervisors, 2026-07-14, retrieved 2026-10-29); donor page: www.seiu1021.org; filing ids, Transactions dataset: 139507483, 155520026; money retrieved 2026-10-30.